FB
Finward Bancorp (FNWD)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- EPS of $0.81 beat S&P Global consensus of $0.40 by $0.41 on stronger net interest margin and lower operating costs; revenue of $17.66M was modestly below $17.80M consensus, while company-defined total revenue was $17.36M in Q3 (+4.4% q/q; +16.7% y/y) . EPS and revenue estimates from S&P Global marked with an asterisk below.*
- Net interest margin expanded to 3.04% (3.18% tax-equivalent) from 2.97% (3.11% TE) in Q2, reflecting higher loan yields and selective payoffs of lower-yielding loans; efficiency ratio improved to 81.22% from 88.92% .
- Credit remained stable with NPLs at 0.94% of loans (up 3 bps q/q); ACL coverage of loans held at 1.22% and coverage of NPLs at 129% .
- Capital and tangible book value strengthened on AOCI improvement: TBV/share rose to $32.77 ($44.16 ex-AOCL) and tier 1 leverage ratio increased to 8.77% .
- Regulatory backdrop improved with the August termination of the BSA/AML Consent Order; however, the Bank remains under an MOU requiring regulatory approval for cash dividends (a $0.12 dividend was declared on Aug 15 for payment on Sep 12) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Margin expansion and operating efficiency: NIM rose to 3.04% (3.18% TE) from 2.97% (3.11% TE) q/q; efficiency ratio improved to 81.22% from 88.92% driven by lower data processing, professional services, and FDIC premiums .
- Balance sheet and capital: TBV/share increased to $32.77 (from $30.16) and TBV ex-AOCL to $44.16 (from $43.47); tier 1 leverage ratio ticked up to 8.77% .
- CEO tone constructive: “We continued to build momentum… Margin expansion and stable credit contributed to further overall profitability gains… The recent rate cut by the Federal Reserve, coupled with our strengthened capital and liquidity position, provides a solid foundation for growth…” .
What Went Wrong
- Slight uptick in non-performing loans: NPLs rose to $13.9M (0.94% of loans) from $13.5M (0.91%) in Q2; net loan charge-offs were 0.07% vs net recoveries of (0.11%) in Q2 .
- Loan balances edged down: Loans receivable net declined to $1.474B from $1.484B q/q, despite higher commercial originations ($62.6M vs $46.1M in Q2) due to paydowns/payoffs .
- Revenue vs S&P consensus: Revenue of $17.66M* was slightly below the $17.80M* consensus, despite company “total revenue” rising to $17.36M .*
Financial Results
Headline metrics vs prior periods
Q3 2025 actuals vs S&P Global consensus
Balance sheet and credit KPIs
Note: Segment breakdown not disclosed; company reports net interest income and non-interest income rather than multi-segment revenues, per consolidated statements .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was posted on the company’s IR “Financial Results” page as of Nov 20, 2025; only the earnings release and 10-Q are provided .
Management Commentary
- CEO (Benjamin Bochnowski): “We continued to build momentum in the third quarter, delivering overall improved profitability. Margin expansion and stable credit contributed to further overall profitability gains, along with benefits in overhead efficiency. The recent rate cut by the Federal Reserve, coupled with our strengthened capital and liquidity position, provides a solid foundation for growth…” .
Q&A Highlights
- No public Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available on the company’s IR site; therefore, no Q&A highlights could be compiled. Reference: IR Financial Results page listing only the earnings release and 10-Q for Q3 2025 .
Estimates Context
- EPS: Q3 2025 actual $0.81 vs $0.40 consensus; Q2 2025 actual $0.50 vs $0.26 consensus; Q4 2025 EPS consensus $0.61*.
- Revenue: Q3 2025 actual $17.66M vs $17.80M consensus; Q2 2025 actual $16.90M vs $16.95M consensus; Q4 2025 revenue consensus $18.25M*. Estimates based on 2 analysts for both EPS and revenue for these periods.* Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The EPS beat was driven by continued NIM expansion and better operating efficiency; the small revenue shortfall (on S&P basis) is not thesis-breaking given strong net interest performance and cost control .*
- Credit quality remains manageable with only a modest uptick in NPLs; ACL levels and coverage remain stable, and net charge-offs normalized from unusually strong net recoveries in Q2 .
- Capital and TBV improved meaningfully with AOCI tailwinds from rate cuts; leverage ratio at 8.77% provides flexibility .
- Funding is stable with higher non-interest-bearing balances and steady core deposit mix at ~69%; borrowings and repos declined ~9% q/q, reducing funding costs .
- Regulatory risk eased with the August termination of the BSA/AML Consent Order; however, the MOU and associated dividend pre-approval requirement remain in place, a consideration for capital return pacing .
- Near-term catalysts: further NIM support from asset repricing, additional operating expense discipline, and any updates on MOU resolution or dividend trajectory could drive sentiment .
- Watch items: office CRE exposure within non-owner-occupied CRE ($42.5M, 2.9% of total loans), overall loan growth trajectory (balances down q/q), and non-interest income trends .